Legal Opinion

Stoner v. Pickett

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 7, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Eite. Bartow superior court. January 24, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

The only question which this case presents for our consideration is whether or not a stipulation for the payment of attorney’s fees, embodied in a promissory note dated September 19, 1896, is, under the act of December 12, 1900, amending section 3667 of the Civil Code (Acts of 1900, p. 53, Yan Epps’' *654Code Supp. § 6185), enforceable when an action is brought on the note and no defense thereto is filed. The trial judge decided this question in the negative, and in our judgment reached the right conclusion. The section of the code just cited, the provisions of which were of force at the time the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hall v. PrattSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dennington v. Mayor of RobertaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Jones v. Peterson, Lott & PaulkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Kirkpatrick v. FawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. American Mortgage Co. of Scotland Ltd. v. RawlingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Booth v. RosierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API