Romanych v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCharles M. Hughes, J.
The plaintiffs sue in this action at law for a sum of money under an insurance policy issued by the defendant on January 13, 1956 for one year. The plaintiffs are the owner and mortgagee, respectively, of about 135 acres of land and buildings at Long Lake, New York. The policy in question contained a mortgagee clause payable to Joseph Zabaw-ski, plaintiff.
In July, 1954 the plaintiff, Michael Romanych, was the sole owner of the premises and Joseph Zabawski was the sole mort*270gagee. At the time, the plaintiff, Michael Eomanych, made a contract in writing with one Boland Austin and Jennie Austin,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Van Pelt v. . McGrawNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Worrall v. . MunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Worrall v. . MunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Potter v. BierwirthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
3Cited by8 opinions
- General Mills, Inc. v. Gold Medal Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Georgitsi Realty, LLC v. Penn-Star Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. AzarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Cresthill Industries, Inc. v. Providence Washington InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Beauty Supplies, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.