Legal Opinion
Romo, Jose v. Gulf Stream Coach
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 21, 2001No. 00-2866PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
After sustaining injuries in a car accident, the appellants (collectively “the Ro-mos”) filed suit in Illinois state court against Gulf Stream Coach and Monogram Conversions (“Gulf Stream”). Gulf Stream removed the case to federal court and then filed a motion to dismiss. In the motion, it maintained that the Romos did not serve process within 120 days of filing the complaint, as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m), or, in the alternative, that the Romos had failed to exercise reasonable diligence when serving process, as required by Illinois Supreme Court Rule 103(b). The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Barry C. Cosgrove, Cross-Appellee v. Joseph Bartolotta and Mary-Bart, Llc, Doing Business as Bartolotta's Lake Park BistroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Mark A. Ball v. City of Chicago and Alfred S. Schultz, Individually and as Agent of the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Allan G. Charles v. Richard M. Daley, State's Attorney, and Eugene F. Diamond, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Melvin P. DeutschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Tompkins v. CyrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jose Romo v. Gulf Stream Coach, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001