Legal Opinion

David Haar v. Orrell Oseland, Trustee

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 2, 1959No. 25173_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

On February 4, 1956, officers of the Knickerbocker Leather & Novelty Co. Inc., now the bankrupt, consulted the appellant, an attorney, about its financial difficulties. A retainer of $2,500 was agreed upon. The attorney prepared and, on February 8, filed a petition for an arrangement, under Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act. On his retainer, he received a check for $1,000 and an assignment of accounts receivable which yielded $1,500. In May, after extensive efforts to consummate an arrangement, the contemplated arrangement failed and bankruptcy ensued. The trustee in bankruptcy petitioned…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matter of OlenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
  2. In Re Designaire Modular Home Corporation. Appeal of Levi, Mandel and Miller (Now Jenkins, Miller & Jenkins, p.c.)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. In the Matter of Casco Fashions, Inc., Bankrupt. New York Credit Men's Adjustment Bureau, Inc., Trustee v. Ballon, Stoll & ItzlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. In the Matter of Louisiana Loan and Thrift Corporation. John M. Holahan v. Albert G. Reynolds, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. Amtel, Inc. v. Sun Spec Industries, Inc. (In Re Sun Spec Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API