Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Federal Deposit Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 28, 1991No. 1626, Docket 91-4027PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OAKES, Chief Judge:

In this case, petitioners, the Attorney General for the State of New York (the “Attorney General”) and various not-for-profit corporations, seek review of a determination by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) that New York’s not-for-profit corporations neither hold their assets in trust for charitable beneficiaries nor maintain separate accounts in different capacities or for different rights, and therefore are not entitled to more than $100,000 per depositor in federal deposit insurance. Because the FDIC has not adequately explained the basis for its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. G. & T. Terminal Packaging Co., Inc. v. Philip A. Hawman and Hawman Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Abrams v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API