Legal Opinion

Crockwell v. Austin

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 9, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2022-1649Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ERIN CROCKWELL, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-1649 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III In his official capacity as United States Secretary of Defense, et al., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Erin Crockwell was granted summary judgment on her Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”),

5 U.S.C. § 702

et seq., challenges to the disability rating she received from the Department of Defense’s (“DOD”) Physical Disability Board of Review (“PDBR”), which affected the benefits she could receive after separating from…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. National Ass'n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API