Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Nelson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1876PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; 'the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

1Per curiam

The judgment in this case is reversed, on the

authority of Hoagland v. Creed, 81 Ill. 506, wherein it was held that parties could not stipulate to confer judicial functions upon an individual, and clothe him with judicial power. This was not an arbitration, Mr. Wood being the arbitrator mutually chosen, but it was an attempt to confer upon him the power of a judge, to decide the pending case, and he did decide it, the court carrying out his decision by entering the judgment he had reached, and not his own judgment. There is no authority for this proceeding, and the judgment must be reversed,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hoagland v. CreedIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. SharifSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Haverly Invincible Mining Co. v. HowcuttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  3. In re CaffreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Russell v. SargentAppellate Court of Illinois · 1880
  5. People ex rel. v. AltgeldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API