Lombardo v. Fielding
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the appellants’ contention, RPAPL 1371 does not bar the instant action. New York law mandates that where a debt is secured by mortgages on two properties, and foreclosure of the first mortgage leaves a deficiency, the failure to obtain a deficiency judgment bars further proceedings to foreclose the second mortgage (see, RPAPL 1371; Sanders v Palmer, 68 NY2d 180). This requirement, however, applies only to mort*673gages secured by property located in New York State (see, Provident Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v Steinmetz, 270 NY 129; Yager v Rubymar Corp., 35 Misc 2d 517). Here, since the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sanders v. PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Provident Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. SteinmetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Yager v. Rubymar Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chemical Bank v. DanaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Volpe v. National Bank of GenevaNew York Supreme Court · 1997
- Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mtge. Corp. v. DanielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024