Hunt v. Lipp
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Douglas county. Heard below before Wakeley, J. cited, as to possession and notice: Giles v. Ortman, 11 Kan., 63; Cartwright v. MeFaclden, 24 Id., 662; O’ Callaghan v. Booth, 6 Cal., 63; Brumagim v. Bradshaw, 39 Id., 24; Kerr v. Hitt, 75 111., 60; ■McLean v. Farden, 61 Id., 108 — 9; Brooks v. Bruyn, 18 Id., 542; Webbs v. Hynes, 9 B. Mon. [Ky.], 388; Bartlett v. Draper, 23 Mo., 407; Miller v. Northup, 49 Id., 397; King v. 8t.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the district court for Douglas county. Heard below before Wakeley, J. cited, as to possession and notice: Giles v. Ortman, 11 Kan., 63; Cartwright v. MeFaclden, 24 Id., 662; O’ Callaghan v. Booth, 6 Cal., 63; Brumagim v. Bradshaw, 39 Id., 24; Kerr v. Hitt, 75 111., 60; ■McLean v. Farden, 61 Id., 108 — 9; Brooks v. Bruyn, 18 Id., 542; Webbs v. Hynes, 9 B. Mon. [Ky.], 388; Bartlett v. Draper, 23 Mo., 407; Miller v. Northup, 49 Id., 397; King v. 8t. Louis Gas Co., 34 Id., 34; Morrison v. Kelly, 22 111., 610 [74 Am. Dec., 169]; Scott v. Delany, 87 Id., 146 ; Copeland v. Murphey, 2…
1Opinion of the Court
Cobb, Ch. J.
This action was brought by the plaintiffs and appellees to quiet their title to the original lot No. 7, of block No. 77, in the town of South Omaha, against the claim of the defendants and appellants.
The plaintiffs alleged, in the court below, “that on April 2, 1886, Alexander H. Swan and his associates, as trustees of the town of South Omaha, being seized in fee simple of said original lot No. 7, deeded the same to the plaintiff, Cary M. Hunt, by deed of general warranty, duly recorded April 3, 1886.
“II. That on September 24, 1887, the plaintiff Hunt, having become possessed of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lipp v. HuntNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Poland v. O'ConnorNebraska Supreme Court · 1871
- Lipp v. HuntNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by2 opinions
- Taylor v. ClarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Mancuso v. RossoNebraska Supreme Court · 1908