Legal Opinion

United States v. John Winston

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 1, 2017No. 16-1978PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY, Chief Judge.

John E. Winston began his term of supervised release January 15, 2016, after being incarcerated for more than 25 years. Upon recommendation from his probation officer, the district court 1 later amended Winston’s supervised release to require Winston to submit his person and property to a search upon reasonable suspicion. Because we conclude the district court did not commit plain error in imposing the search condition and the search condition does not violate due process or the Ex Post Facto Clause of Article I, § 9 of the United States Constitution, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. United States v. Derrick CrumeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. WiedowerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Nathan MeltonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. OliverasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
  2. United States v. The-Nimrod SterlingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Gary SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. James Norris, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  5. People v. Salcido, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API