Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Bradley

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 2001No. S-9345PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

Robert Bradley appeals from a partial money judgment entered against him on which the court permitted writs of execution to issue. All parties agree that the judgment is partial because not all of the claims and counterclaims have been adjudicated. Because the superior court has not certified pursuant to Civil Rule 54(b) that there is no just reason for delay, the partial Judgment is not final. Because the judgment is not final and thus cannot be appealed of right, 1 we have treated Robert Bradley's appeal as a petition for review. 2 We grant the petition and conclude…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Redding & Company, Inc. v. Russwine Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  2. Johnson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. CIT Financial Services v. Herb's Indoor RV CenterIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Aleut Corp. v. RogersAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. v. SalazarHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Starr v. GeorgeAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API