Rodriguez v. State

OPINION

ROBERTS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of burglary and sentenced to twelve years’ imprisonment.

Appellant’s first ground of error alleges that the jury “ . . . failed to follow the court’s instructions and definitions specifically regarding circumstantial evidence.”

This statement is too general to apprise this Court of the specific error of which appellant complains. See Art. 40.09, § 9, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. However, from the arguments accompanying appellant’s first ground of error, it appears that his position is that the circumstantial evidence, on which the State’s case…