Legal Opinion

Fairchild v. Cloudcroft Lumber & Land Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1921No. 2505Published

Appeal from District Court, Otero County; Ed Mechem, Judge. Suit by S. W. Fairchild against the Cloudcroft Lumber & Land Company and others. Judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT.

RAYNOLDS, J.

This is a suit brought for an injunction and damages by 0the appellant, plaintiff below, against the appellees, defendants below, praying for a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from operating and conducting a sawmill on plaintiff’s lands, and for maintaining nuisances about the same, blocking the roads, destroying the fences, etc. The complaint prayed for an accounting as to plaintiff’s damages and a permanent-injunction.

An order to show* cause why the temporary injunction should not issue as prayed for was entered, and upon the rule to show…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Montoya v. Unknown Heirs of VigilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Gradi v. BachechiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  3. First Nat. Bank of Albuquerque v. StaleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API