Legal Opinion

Wood Oil Co. v. Corporation Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 26, 1951No. 33484PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Herein, Wood Oil Company and Chas. M. Day, plaintiffs in error, will be referred to as “plaintiffs”, and Toklan Production Company, J. G. Catlett, Inc., and Sinclair Prairie Oil & Gas Company, defendants in error, will be referred to, respectively, as “Toklan”, “Catlett” and “Sinclair”, and, collectively, as “defendants”.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the Corporation Commission denying plaintiffs’ application to modify a previous order of the commission, known as order 19890, whereby the boundaries of Wayne Pool, theretofore established by the commission, were extended to…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cameron v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Union Texas Petroleum, a Division of Allied Chemical Corp. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Wood Oil Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Crest Resources and Exploration Corp. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Ward v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API