Legal Opinion
Kapiloff v. Locke
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 22, 1975No. [No. 14, September Term, 1975.]PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEldridge, J.
Smith and Orth, JJ., dissent and filed a dissenting opinion at page 474 infra.
In this case we are concerned with whether the admission into evidence of two letters violated the hearsay rule, and, if so, whether the error was prejudicial.
Grinnell W. Locke and Richard N. Jackson, Jr., partners doing business as Locke and Jackson, Architects, entered into a contract with The Equitable Trust Company of Baltimore, Maryland, to perform certain architectural services in connection with the construction of a proposed office building to be located at 200 W. Cold Spring Lane in Baltimore. The contract…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Roads Commission v. KuenneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Morrow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Thomas v. OwensCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- M. A. Realty Co. v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Smith v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Beahm v. ShortallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Harris v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- In Re Yve S.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Hollingsworth & Vose Co. v. ConnorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.