Legal Opinion

State v. . Kirksey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1947PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

Defendant in brief filed in this Court presents, as involved on this appeal, three questions, which we consider seriahm:

I. The question arises in this manner: After defendant had been arraigned and had pleaded not guilty, and trial had begun, and after eleven jurors had been duly selected, and after defendant had exhausted all peremptory challenges allowed by law, another special venireman, B. J. Mincher, was called and accepted by the State, and tendered to defendant, who challenged the juror peremptorily, upon the ground that defendant, being of the colored race and all of the eleven jurors…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thomas v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. State v. . HensleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. State v. . LevySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. State v. . StarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. State v. . WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. CokerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. United States v. Kenneth C. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  5. State v. PeeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API