Sarnacki v. Golden
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, Chief Judge.
This is a shareholder derivative suit under state law which, after investigation by a Special Litigation Committee, the corporation rejected. It is one of several suits alleging that Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (“Smith & Wesson”) made misleading public statements in 2007 about demand for its products. We previously affirmed a grant of summary judgment for the corporation in a class action alleging that these statements constituted violations of federal securities laws. In re Smith & Wesson Holding Corp. Sec. Litig., 669 F.3d 68 (1st Cir.2012).
In this case, Aaron…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- Grimes v. DonaldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Spiegel v. BuntrockSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Lewis v. GravesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Charlotte Kokocinski v. Arthur D. Collins, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Tegra Corp. v. BoeshartNebraska Supreme Court · 2024
- IN RE: DISH NETWORK DERIVATIVE LITIG. C/W 69012Nevada Supreme Court · 2017
- IN RE: DISH NETWORK DERIVATIVE LITIG. C/W 69012Nevada Supreme Court · 2017
- IN RE: DISH NETWORK DERIVATIVE LITIG. C/W 69012Nevada Supreme Court · 2017