Legal Opinion

Sarnacki v. Golden

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 4, 2015No. 14-1414PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Chief Judge.

This is a shareholder derivative suit under state law which, after investigation by a Special Litigation Committee, the corporation rejected. It is one of several suits alleging that Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (“Smith & Wesson”) made misleading public statements in 2007 about demand for its products. We previously affirmed a grant of summary judgment for the corporation in a class action alleging that these statements constituted violations of federal securities laws. In re Smith & Wesson Holding Corp. Sec. Litig., 669 F.3d 68 (1st Cir.2012).

In this case, Aaron…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  2. Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  3. Grimes v. DonaldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  4. Spiegel v. BuntrockSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  5. Lewis v. GravesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Charlotte Kokocinski v. Arthur D. Collins, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. Tegra Corp. v. BoeshartNebraska Supreme Court · 2024
  3. IN RE: DISH NETWORK DERIVATIVE LITIG. C/W 69012Nevada Supreme Court · 2017
  4. IN RE: DISH NETWORK DERIVATIVE LITIG. C/W 69012Nevada Supreme Court · 2017
  5. IN RE: DISH NETWORK DERIVATIVE LITIG. C/W 69012Nevada Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API