Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Kansas Soldiers' Compensation Board

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 12, 1927No. 26,601PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is a soldiers’ compensation case. The sole question presented is whether the claimant had an honorable discharge .within the meaning of our compensation statute. (R. S. 73-102.) Claimant attended the officers’ training camp at Fort Riley. He *391has been paid compensation for the time there spent, in accordance with the decision of this court in State, ex rel., v. Davis, 114 Kan. 270, syl. ¶ 2, 217 Pac. 905. That is not in controversy. At the close of his training service, August 17, 1917, he received a commission as second lieutenant in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Griffith v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. In re Soldiers' Compensation AppealsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Seigle v. Kansas Soldiers' Compensation BoardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fessler v. Kansas Soldiers' Compensation BoardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API