Legal Opinion

Longino v. MacHen

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 2, 1950No. 4-9259PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

In 1919 S. Y. Rogers and others executed to E. I. Newblock an oil and gas lease upon an eighty-acre tract. This lease was in the customary form, reserving to the lessors a one-eighth royalty in all oil and gas produced under the lease. In the following year the lessors executed and delivered to L. A. Longino a deed, the construction of which is the only question presented by this case. The appellants, Longino’s heirs, contend that the effect of the 1920 deed was to convey an undivided one-fourth interest in all oil and gas underlying the tract in question. The appellees, who have acquired the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bellport v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. Rist v. Toole CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Keaton v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. McWilliams v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wynn v. Sklar & Phillips Oil CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Davis v. CollinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  3. Kopp v. BairdIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Arkansas Valley Royalty Co. v. Arkansas-Oklahoma Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  5. Kopp v. BairdIdaho Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API