State v. Bieker
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Rulon, C.J.:
Defendant James Bieker appeals the district court’s denial of his motions to suppress, arguing that defendant’s statements to the police were taken in violation of Miranda and the police officers did not possess reasonable suspicion justifying a stop and search of the defendant. We affirm.
On December 15, 2003, police investigators Janell Zimmerman and Lane Mangels received a report from Target that a suspicious individual had purchased a 96-count box of ephedrine cold tablets. The reporting employee described the individual and reported the individual had entered a blue Chevrolet…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. SchroederNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. CarusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- State v. BastianCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
- State v. BastianCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.