Legal Opinion

In re Pilot Flying J Fuel Rebate Contract Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided August 8, 2013No. MDL No. 2468PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel: * Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiff in the Northern District of Ohio action moves for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings *1374in the Southern District of Mississippi.1 This litigation currently consists of eight actions pending in six districts as listed on Schedule A.2

Plaintiffs in four actions and potential tag-along actions support centralization in the Southern District of Mississippi and plaintiff in a District of New Hampshire potential tag-along action supports centralization in the Northern District of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Schnuck Markets, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
  2. In re Pilot Flying J Fuel Rebate Contract Litigation (No. II)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
  3. In re Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
  4. In re: Perrigo-Manufactured Glucosamine Products Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API