Legal Opinion

Baker v. Morris

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Greenwood District Court. At the May Term, 1884, plaintiff Morris recovered a judgment for $50 and costs against defendant Baker, who brings it here for review. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

*581The opinion of the court was delivered by

YALENTINE, J.:

The only question presented to this court for determination is, whether the following bill of particulars sets forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The amended bill of particulars (omitting court and title) reads as follows:

“Now comes the above plaintiff, and for cause of complaint against said defendant says, that said defendant is justly indebted to him in the sum of seventy-five dollars, as follows, to wit: That on or about the 21st day of December, 1883, one Frank Baker, a son of said defendant, and a minor, did…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Edwards v. CrumeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. American Family Mutual Insurance v. GrimSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  3. Capps v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Gansey v. OrrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  5. Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API