Legal Opinion

The Barbara Cates

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1934No. 9PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

These exceptions raise the question of jurisdiction in admiralty. Whether any complaint is the proper subject of the law maritime, and hence whether it is of admiralty jurisdiction, is a subject, unavoidably or purposely, left murky.

The instant case concerns itself with a collision between a vessel and a construction in navigable waters. The abstract proposition has been well expressed in the phrases that the question turns “upon the locality of the tort, the nature of the structure and its use.” It is thus clear that whether a given ease is the proper subject of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The SenatorDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Christenson S. S. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Chesapeake Marine Ry. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API