Legal Opinion

Detroit Transportation Co. v. Board of Assessors

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1892PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Mandamus. Belator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to remove its name from the assessment roll. The facts are .stated in the opinion.

1Per curiam

The petition in this case sets forth that the relator is a Michigan corporation, organized under “‘An act to authorize the formation of corporations for *383the purpose of engaging in commerce or navigation,” and acts amendatory thereof; that its articles of association are duly filed and recorded; that its general office for business is located in the township of Hamtramck; that its amended articles of association contain the following:

“ The office for the transaction of the business of the said corporation shall be in the township of Hamtramck, in the county of Wayne, and State of Michigan.”

That…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Western Transportation Company v. . ScheuNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Steamship Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Orloff v. Morehead Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Teagan Transportation Co. v. Board of AssessorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Higgins v. Hampshire Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Inter-Southern Life Insurance v. MillikenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API