Legal Opinion

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. RONALD MCLEMORE

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 2019No. SD35347PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) v. ) No. SD35347 ) RONALD MCLEMORE, ) Filed: May 14, 2019 ) Defendant-Appellant. ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TANEY COUNTY Honorable Eric D. Eighmy AFFIRMED Ronald McLemore (“Defendant”) appeals his conviction, after a jury trial, for attempted forcible sodomy in the first degree. See section 566.060. 1 Defendant’s sole point claims there was insufficient evidence supporting the necessary element that he used forcible compulsion in attempting to sodomize his victim. We disagree and affirm his conviction. Applicable Law and Standard of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. NiederstadtSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  2. State v. VandevereSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  3. State v. DaleskeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Finley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. KilmartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ronald McLemore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2021
  2. STATE OF MISSOURI v. STEVEN EUGENE HARDCASTLEMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ALEJANDRO FLORES-MARTINEZMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API