Legal Opinion

Krakower v. Tauber

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 17, 1903Published

Appeal from City Court of New York, Special Term. Action by Tobias Kralcower against Abraham Tauber From an order granting a motion for discontinuance, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

The order appealed from granted a discontinuance of the action, without costs, “after hearing the attorneys for the plaintiff in support of said motion, and the attorneys for the defendant appearing, but not opposing.” For the purposes of an appeal,, the order itself shows the appellant’s consent to the actual direction made, and if in fact counsel had not consented to the omission to impose terms for the discontinuance he should have brought that fact to the attention of the court below, and have procured a resettlement.

Upon the record before us there is nothing which calls for the .…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dawson v. ParsonsNew York Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API