Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Lee

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 12, 1912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Barbour Chancery Court. Heard, before Hon. L. D. Gardner. Bill by A. T. Lee and another against R. D. Reynolds, to restrain foreclosure proceedings and to decree cancellation of the mortgage upon payment of the sum found to be due. From a decree granting the relief respondent appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Barbour Chancery Court. Heard, before Hon. L. D. Gardner. Bill by A. T. Lee and another against R. D. Reynolds, to restrain foreclosure proceedings and to decree cancellation of the mortgage upon payment of the sum found to be due. From a decree granting the relief respondent appeals. The Act 1901, page 164, now appearing as section 4623, Code 1907, was passed some years after the contract was entered into and to-construe it as applicable to this contract so as to avoid all payment of interest because of the usury in the mortgage would be to impair the obligation of the contract…

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether section 4623 of the Code of 1907, embodying the act of March 4,1901 (Acts 1901, p. 164), as it amended section 2630 of the Code of 1896, is, as. to such amendatory portion, operative in favor of debtors whose usurious obligations were contracted prior to March 4, 1901. The effect of this amendment to the former statute was to finally abrogate the doctrine of courts of equity that a debtor, who as actor sought equitable relief against a usurious contract, must do equity by the payment of legal interest, as a condition to obtaining such…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Satterlee v. MatthewsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. President of the Bank of the United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  4. Walker v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Antoni v. GreenhowSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lewis v. HickmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Lamar v. Lincoln Reserve Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Preston Motors Corporation v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Williams v. NolandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Law, Clark & Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API