Legal Opinion
People v. Proctor
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 1992PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*994OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed. Not having raised the issue by motion to vácate or otherwise in the court of first instance, defendant’s argument that there was a failure to comply with the procedures of CPL 400.20 has not been preserved for our review (People v Oliver, 63 NY2d 973; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). Defendant’s remaining claim is meritless.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. PellegrinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. OliverNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by65 opinions
- People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. SammsNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. KorberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. WinslowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. BynumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.