Legal Opinion

McElveen v. Ferre

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 31, 1989No. 1380PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Yvonne McElveen sued Dr. George Ferre for medical malpractice, alleging that he was negligent in numerous particulars related to two back surgeries he performed on her. The jury returned a verdict for Ferre. The court denied McElveen’s motions for judgment non obstante veredicto and for a new trial. McElveen appeals on the grounds that (1) the evidence overwhelmingly supported her claims; and that the court erred (2) in admitting certain evidence, (3) in its charge to the jury, and (4) in permitting improper closing argument by Ferre’s counsel. We affirm.

1. McElveen contends the evidence…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Madden v. CoxCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Varnadore v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  3. King v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. Birmingham News Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. McVey v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. STALK v. RiceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  2. State v. HarryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Mishoe v. QHG of Lake City, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  5. State v. PrimusCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API