Legal Opinion

James v. Copinger

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 20, 1971No. Nos. 12474, 13024PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAVEN, Circuit Judge:

Robert James and Matthew Mack Callahan have petitioned for rehearing after our abstention in favor of state court determination of the retroactivity of North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969). See, James v. Copinger, 428 F.2d 235 (4 Cir., 1970). Petitioner James urges that the law in Maryland is already settled against applying Pearce retroactively. Pratt v. Warden, 8 Md.App. 274, 259 A. 2d 580 (1969). Petitioner Callahan urges that the courts of Virginia have indicated a similar disposition, see, Evans v. Richmond, 210 Va. 403, 407,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Michigan v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Michigan v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. NashSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  4. Jesse Eugene Dearinger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. Shiflett v. VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API