Legal Opinion

Karrels v. Adolph Coors Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 16, 1988No. 86 C 9432PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ALESIA, District Judge.

Plaintiff Ronald M. Karrels (“Karrels”) brings this two-count diversity action against defendants Mechanics Laundry & Supply Company, Inc. (“Mechanics”) and Adolph Coors Company (“Coors”) for injuries allegedly arising out of a swimming pool accident. In his second amended complaint, Karrels named Mildred French and Edwin French (collectively “French”), in their individual capacities as additional defendants. Defendants French are citizens of Indiana and allegedly co-owners of Monarch Beverage Co. (“Monarch”), an Indiana corporation. 1…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Margaret E. Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Colleen A. Cote v. Peter J. Wadel and Wadel & Bulger, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Salama v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dicken v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1994
  2. Amoco Oil Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  3. Chedid v. Boardwalk Regency Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
  4. Espino v. Top Draw Freight System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  5. Robinson v. Town of MadisonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API