Legal Opinion
Weaver v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided November 25, 1930No. 4 Div. 709PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The evidence in this case has been read by the court sitting en banc, and in it there is to be found no sufficient evidence connecting this defendant with the possession of -the prohibited liquor. A constructive possession is not sufficient; there must be coupled with such possession evidence tending to prove a guilty scienter. Huckabaa v. State, 23 Ala. App. 333, 125 So. 202.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Huckabaa v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walls v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
- Thurman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940