Legal Opinion

State v. Bean

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1855PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from, St. Louis Criminal Court. 1. A general verdict upon an indictment containing several counts will not stand. (State v. Montague, 2 McCord.) 2. The verdict is beyond the limit of the law. (R. C. 1845, p. 698.)

1Opinion of the CourtRyland, Judge

The defendant, Bean, was indicted for keeping and maintaining a bawdy house. The indictment contains two counts. The first count charges the defendant with keeping and maintaining a bawdy house ; the second count is for keeping and maintaining a disorderly house.

The defendant pleaded not guilty. The jury found a general verdict of guilty against the defendant, and assessed his punishment at twelve months’ imprisonment in the county jail and a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars.

*270The defendant moved in arrest of judgment, and also for a new trial, which being overruled, he brings the ease…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. FenlySupreme Court of Missouri · 1853

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  2. Dalton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1878
  3. State v. SimpsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API