Legal Opinion

Strasburg v. Tudor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 19, 1924No. 14307PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Cimarron county by R. S. Tudor against H. H. Strasburg to recover $00 alleged to be the balance due for drilling a well under an oral contract. Strasburg filed an answer and cross-petition, admitted the drilling of the well under a contract, but alleges the plaintiff agreed to drill a straight hole, and guaranteeing the well would not be completed in quicksand; and for a counterclaim alleges the hole was crooked and was completed in quicksand, and asks for recovery of $100 paid the plaintiff on said contract and $100 for loss of easing. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Firebaugh v. Du BoisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First State Bank of Inola v. DickersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API