Legal Opinion

Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC v. Federal Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 16, 2012No. 2010-1376PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC and Bridgestone Corporation (together “Bridgestone”) appeal the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“Ttajb” or “Board”) dismissing Bridge-stone’s opposition to registration of the mark MILANZA for use with tires. The Board concluded that there is no likelihood of confusion as to source, as between Bridgestone’s marks POTENZA and TURANZA, on one hand, and Federal Corporation’s mark MILANZA, all for use with tires. 1 We reverse the Board’s decision, and sustain the opposition.

Background

Bridgestone registered the mark…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  4. Saxlehner v. Eisner & Mendelson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Recot, Inc. v. M.C. BectonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Viacom International, Inc. v. IJR Capital InvestmeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  2. CSL Silicones, Inc. v. Midsun Grp. Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
  3. Spireon, Inc. v. Flex Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
  4. Smartling, Inc. v. Skawa Innovation Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  5. Sazerac Co. v. Fetzer Vineyards, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API