Legal Opinion

Cole v. Cassidy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 13, 1885PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, C. J.

This is an action of tort for deceit. The declaration alleges that the defendant was a director of the Pacific National Bank; that he falsely and fraudulently represented of his own knowledge that the bank was sound; that the plaintiff was thereby induced to buy stock and make deposits in the bank; that the bank was not sound; and that the defendant, when he made the representations, knew them to be untrue. The case proceeded upon two grounds; one, that the defendant, to induce the plaintiff to act, stated facts which he knew to be untrue; the other, that he stated facts, as of his own…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Litchfield v. HutchinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Milliken v. ThorndikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Chatham Furnace Co. v. MoffattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Hindman v. First Nat. Bank of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  3. Stewart v. JoyceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Boddy v. HenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  5. Harris v. Delco Products, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API