Legal Opinion

Wessels v. Beeman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Gratiot. (Hart, J.) Trover. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The plaintiff brought an action of trover against defendants for the unlawful conversion of certain tobacco, cigars, stamped and not stamped, buggies, bookcases, seals, saws, tobacco cutter, show-case, cheese-case, *344cracker-case, fanning-mill, coffee-mill, lot of paper pails, boxes, cans, and one fire-proof safe.

The defendants pleaded the general issue, and gave notice that defendant Beéman was a judgment creditor of Aaron Wessels, and said goods were seized and legally liable to be taken, and were seized under an execution issued upon a valid judgment in favor of Beeman against Aaron Wessels,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Niagara Fire Insurance v. DeGraffMichigan Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Buessel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  2. Wessels v. BeemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Case v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  4. Perea v. Colorado National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Paull v. PaullSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API