Andrew J. Andrist and Douglas S. Stanhope v. Stephen P. Spleen
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.
This case illustrates the exception to a rule. The defendants appeal an order awarding them attorney’s fees, but limiting the amount to the $100 bond posted by the plaintiff for an ex parte temporary injunction. They argue the trial court erred in limiting the award because they did not have notice of the hearing at which the trial court determined the amount, and they diligently sought relief from the injunction. We agree and reverse.
The case arose from the plaintiffs concern that he would be defamed by the defendants as part of their comedy act. The plaintiff filed an emergency ex parte…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parker Tampa Two, Inc. v. Somerset Development Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Gibbs Const. Co. v. SL Page Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Roger Dean Chevrolet, Inc. v. Painters, Etc., Local No. 452District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- SeaEscape, Ltd. v. Maximum Mktg. Exposure, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Lotenfoe v. PahkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burke v. Sunco Title & Escrow Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- DAWN RENE HOLDING, LLC and DAVID MATHIESEN v. WORLD JET OF DELAWARE, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021