Legal Opinion

Glaser v. Haskin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

In .the first answer to plaintiff’s complaint defendant set forth as a counterclaim the note of plaintiff given defendant for the sum of $2,482. Afterward an amended answer was filed with the counterclaim omitted. Plaintiff introduced the original answer in evidence. This was done over the objection and exception of defendant.

The main contention of defendant is that plaintiff cannot enforce the settlement contract for the reason that plaintiff did not give or tender a new note in place of the old note of his to defendant for the sum of $2,482, “without interest at rate of no per cent per…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cornely v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Crosland v. SloanOregon Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Haskin v. GlaserOregon Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API