Legal Opinion

McIlvaine v. Delaney

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 29, 1933No. Nos. 29,684, 29,685, 29,686PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSEN, Justice.

Three suits by three different plaintiffs against the defendant, Frank J. Delaney, to recover damages for personal injuries suffered in a collision between an automobile driven by one Harry Mcllvaine, in which car plaintiffs were passengers, and an automobile driven by defendant. The three suits were tried together, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant in each case. Plaintiffs moved for a new trial, and each appeals from the order denying the motion. The appeals have been consolidated and are presented here on one record.

The collision happened on July 24, 1932,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maroney v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Rechtzigel v. National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Cramer v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hanson v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Champlin Refining Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  3. Hack v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API