Legal Opinion
John Doe v. Regional School Unit 26
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided January 30, 2014No. Docket Pen-12-582PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSilver, J.
[¶ 1] John and Jane Doe, parents of Susan Doe,1 and the Maine Human Rights *602Commission appeal from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Pe-nobscot County, Anderson, J.) in favor of Regional School Unit 26 on the Does’ complaint pursuant to the Maine Human Rights Act (MHRA), 5 M.R.S. §§ 4592(1), 4602(4) (2013). RSU 26 argues that the public accommodations section of the MHRA conflicts with a statutory provision regarding sanitary facilities in schools, 20-A M.R.S. § 6501 (2013). We are called upon for the first time to interpret the MHRA, and particularly several amendments enacted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. KlunkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- Claire Trott v. H.D. Goodall HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- State v. NilesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Clark v. State Employees Appeals BoardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- State v. DaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- James M. Dickau v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Christine S. Angell v. Renald C. HalleeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Oceanic Inn, Inc. v. Sloan's Cove, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. SommervilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
- John J. Monahan Jr. v. Judith B. MonahanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.