Legal Opinion

Manning v. New York City Transit Authority

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1959Published

1Opinion of the CourtIrving H. Saypol, J.

Motion by plaintiff for examination before trial of defendant. Defendant objects to the examination because its demand for a bill of particulars has gone unheeded to date. It states that it would agree to such examination provided it receives a bill of particulars 10 days before the examination. Since the alleged accident took place on a subway train, defendant is willing to produce at the examination the motorman and conductor, but objects to producing “ any other employee in the Engineering Department * * * who may have knowledge and facts pertaining to the operation of the safety…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Overseas Airlines, Inc. v. CoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  2. New York Telephone Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Titterington v. Pioneer Instrument Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. Ayew v. Willard Hawes & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API