National Westminster Bank, PLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment in connection with this tax refund case. Previously, in National Westminster Bank, PLC v. United States, 44 Fed.Cl. 120 (1999) (“Nat-West J”), the court ruled that Treasury Regulation 1.882-5 (“Treasury Regulation” or “Regulation”), was inconsistent with Article 7 of the Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation, Dec. 31, 1975, U.S.-U.K., 31 U.S.T. 5668 (“U.S.-U.K. Treaty” or “Treaty”) and, thus, could not be used for calculating interest deductions by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bogardus v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. AvaglianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Maximov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Westminster Bank, PLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- National Westminster Bank, PLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Ohio Department of Natural ResourcesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008