Legal Opinion

National Westminster Bank, PLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 14, 2003No. 95-758TPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

FIRESTONE, Judge.

Pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment in connection with this tax refund case. Previously, in National Westminster Bank, PLC v. United States, 44 Fed.Cl. 120 (1999) (“Nat-West J”), the court ruled that Treasury Regulation 1.882-5 (“Treasury Regulation” or “Regulation”), was inconsistent with Article 7 of the Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation, Dec. 31, 1975, U.S.-U.K., 31 U.S.T. 5668 (“U.S.-U.K. Treaty” or “Treaty”) and, thus, could not be used for calculating interest deductions by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Bogardus v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. AvaglianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Maximov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Westminster Bank, PLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  2. National Westminster Bank, PLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Ohio Department of Natural ResourcesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API