Legal Opinion

R. L. Polk & Co. v. Living Aluminum Corp.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 15, 1973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, C.J.

The plaintiff brought separate actions in contract seeking to recover from each of the defendants for services rendered by the plaintiff to the defendants and for expenses incurred in their behalf in conducting a direct mail advertising campaign for the defendants, which are in the home improvement business. The defendants answered by general denials and pleas of payment. The cases were tried together in the Superior Court. A jury returned verdicts against the defendant Living Aluminum Corp. (Aluminum) for $26,863.31 and against the defendant Living Vinyl Corp. (Vinyl) for $5,642.18. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SubiloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. D'AGOSTINOMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. Commonwealth v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  4. Commonwealth v. KleciakMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  5. Davis v. Hotels Statler Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CefaloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Harris-Lewis v. MudgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  3. McLaughlin v. CunninghamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  4. Cain v. AkikieMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  5. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp. v. BartlemanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API