Legal Opinion
Amro v. Office of Attorney General
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 18, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Rafic A. Amro, M.D., petitions for review of an adjudication of the Office of Attorney General (OAG) denying Amro’s request to examine his criminal investigation file under the act commonly known as the Right-to-Know Act, Act of June 21, 1957, P.L. 390, as amended, 65 P.S. §§ 66.1-66.4. Amro contends that this action is properly in the Court’s original jurisdiction and that he should be permitted to amend his pro se complaint pursuant to the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure now that he has legal counsel. Amro further contends that, as an innocent victim of orchestrated…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- R. v. Com., Dept. of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- LaValle v. OFFICE OF GEN. COUNSEL OF COM.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- North Hills News Record v. Town of McCandlessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- TIMES PUB. CO., INC. v. MichelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- PG Publishing Co. v. County of WashingtonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.