Gruber v. Savannah River Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
We are not prepared to assent to the construction placed by the District Judge on tho decision of tho Supreme Court of South Carolina in Richardson v. Cooler, 115 S. C. 102, 104 S. E. 305. On that point it is not necessary to express an opinion. We adopt the reasoning of the District Judge on which he reaches the conclusion that Mr. Gruber is estopped, and on that ground affirm the judgment.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Richardson v. CoolerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
3Cited by10 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Co. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1960
- Marec v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1961
- (HC) Doran v. BrewerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Johnson v. LizarragaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Bunnell v. SaulDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.