Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Peterson v. Scott

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1929No. File No. 6928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbel-L, J.

' Relators instituted this proceeding in the court below seeking a writ of mandamus directed to the defendants, as members of the board of county commissioners of Meade county, S. D. The- application for the writ duly alleged the office of defendants; that the county of-Meade has always contained five commissioner districts, district No. i embracing the city of Sturgis in said county together with a considerable, amount of additional territory. The application further sets out facts sufficient upon their face to show that it -was the duty of the board of commissioners of Meade county at the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Conn v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. McConihe v. State, ex rel. McMurraySupreme Court of Florida · 1879
  3. Barnum v. EwingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. State ex rel. Arthurs v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State ex rel. New York Life Insurance v. PhilipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Puffy's, LLC v. Dep't of HealthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  2. Rosander v. Board of County Commissioners of Butte CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Rosander v. BD. OF CTY. COMR'S OF BUTTE CTY.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API