Legal Opinion

Sodowsky v. Sodowsky

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 12, 1915No. 4504PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from District Court, Kay County; Wm. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by Dosia Sodowsky against Clarence Sodow-sky. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings errsr.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THACKER, C.

The plaintiff in error, a wife, brought this action’ against the defendant in error, her husband, to recover $785.50 upon charges against him alleged, in substance, as follows:

That, defendant being indebted to plaintiff’s father in the sum of $280 for two mule colts (purchased at $120), for a mare (purchased at $150), and for a sow and pigs (purchased at $10), the plaintiff paid off and discharged this indebtedness at defendant’s instance and request; that, at the instance and request of defendant, plaintiff loaned him five several sums of money amounting in their…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fiedler v. FiedlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Riggs v. RiggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Schomaker v. SchomakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Heintz v. HeintzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Decker v. KedlyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bohun v. KinaszSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  2. Gregg v. GreggCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  3. Smith v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. People v. VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Perry v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API