Legal Opinion

State v. Dyck

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 6, 1904No. 13,623PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Marion district court; O. L. Moose, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cunning-ham, J. :

We find we have no jurisdiction to pass upon the merits of this case. Appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled at the February *559term,'1903, “and was given until May 4, 1903, within ■ which to prepare and have settled a bill of exceptions.” On May 4 an order was made by the judge, extending this time for ten days, and on May 13 the bill of exceptions was settled. The time originally given, being until May 4, expired with the expiration of May 3 ; consequently on May 4, when the additional time was given,, the court had lost…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Croco v. HilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. State v. BradburySupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HorineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Jeremy Fuel & Grain Co. v. Denver & R. G. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Maynes v. GraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Barnes v. GideonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  5. Barnes v. GideonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API