United States v. Rohalia Roberts
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:
This case raises the narrow question whether an evidentiary hearing should have been held on a motion for a new trial. Rohalia Roberts appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, John M. Cannella, J., denying without an evidentiary hearing appellant’s motion for a new trial. For reasons given below, we hold that there should have been a hearing. Accordingly, we remand for that purpose.
Appellant was tried on a two-count indictment charging the unlawful sale of heroin on two occasions. After a one-day trial, Judge…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Giles v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Miller v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- People v. GogginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- United States v. FeolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- United States v. James G. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Esperanza Saa, Gabriel Saa, Martha Vega, Luis AndradeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.